Daredevil (2003)

Thank you for rating this movie!

Daredevil (2003) Movie Poster

4.29 / 5

User rating: 4.29

Based on 11672 votes and 179 reviews


  • User rating: 4.29 77.96%
  • User rating: 4.29 2.56%
  • User rating: 4.29 2.83%
  • User rating: 4.29 4.09%
  • User rating: 4.29 12.56%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?




Type the code:


 

Showing 161 to 179 of 179

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

You have to remember it is a comic book hero brought to life , it is not suppossed to be shakespere .I think it was a pretty good adaptation .

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

DAREDEVIL has to go on a DIET. The producers could have saved a few million bucks and hired Andy Richter to play the title role. This is the chubbiest superhero since Mimi Bobek!

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

go and wash it, `cause it stinks

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

seems to me that there is a backlash against affleck these days...thats the only reason I can think of for such unintelligent responses so far...however this movie was well done, stayed very close to the character and main comic story, effects were good, and ben, jennifer and colin all did a respectable job with the direction and scripting that they had to work with.

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

Excellent movie. Go check it out

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

deviled ham more like it...lame movie...ben was a bore

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

I thought the movie was SSSIIICCCKKK!!! but hey...that`s just me, write what you think to!

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

I thought this movie was one of the best movies iv seen in a LONG time,Ben Affleck,Jennifer Garner and Collin Farrell give a great perofrmance,definitly going to see this again!

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

i hate it

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

worst movie ever its copiing spider man and all its SUCK DONT GO SPEND YOUR MONEY ON "THAT"!!!!

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

WAIT FOR THE VIDEO FOLKS

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

DareDevil was darker then BATMAN , more action then Spiderman , lots of fight scenes , stays prety close to original story line .go see it

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

though i think they needed to make it longer to develop characters more, i thought this was a pretty decent movie. Farrell plays a pretty kool psyco. he made this movie much better

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

definitely a poor-man`s Spidey, Batman, Superman, all the X-Men....hey, this is a bad movie

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

Ben Affleck had SEXUAL CHARISMA in a film just once in his career - and that was with Matt Damon. This guy`s as stiff as a board [no pun intended] But Jennifer....Grrrrrr!

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

Tied with Kangaroo Jack as the worst movie of the past 12 months. Stingeroo! - bling, bling

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

Daredevil, in this movie at least, is little more than a hollow clone of Batman and Spider-Man, with far less idiosyncrasy than either

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

The problem with DAREDEVIL is, regardless of the glut of PR hype, Affleck doesn’t have sexual charisma. He can’t hold the screen — with or without the mask

User review rating: 0 February 14, 2003

crap, crap, crap