The Perks of Being a Wallflower

Thank you for rating this movie!

The Perks of Being a Wallflower Movie Poster

3.32 / 5

User rating: 3.32

Based on 150 votes and 73 reviews


  • User rating: 3.32 44.59%
  • User rating: 3.32 14.86%
  • User rating: 3.32 4.05%
  • User rating: 3.32 1.35%
  • User rating: 3.32 35.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?




Type the code:


 

Showing 41 to 73 of 73

User review rating: 0 October 16, 2012

Oh man, I couldn't believe what a stinker this was! Plays like a bad sitcom, only less interesting.

User review rating: 5 October 16, 2012

Best film of the year! One of those whole-package films, with a little bit of everything in the story all carried by an incredible cast & crew.

User review rating: 0 October 15, 2012

Deeper themes were explored on Charles in Charge.

User review rating: 5 October 15, 2012

I haven't watched it yet, but I am a big fan of the book. I think for Charlie they should have got Anton Yelchin. Just knowing the character I think that would have been the perfect actor to play him... And also knowing the Sam character I'm betting Emma Watson was a great choice...

User review rating: 1 October 14, 2012

Amateur hour.

User review rating: 0 October 13, 2012

Quite possibly the WORST movie I have ever seen.

User review rating: 1 October 13, 2012

Save your money. The flaccid writing and lackluster performances make this a real slog. It picked up briefly during the "fart party" scene, but by then it was too late.

User review rating: 0 October 12, 2012

A piffle.

User review rating: 5 October 11, 2012

i love this movie

User review rating: 3 October 11, 2012

Go to watch Logan. He does some amazing acting this in this.

User review rating: 5 October 11, 2012

fantastic

User review rating: 1 October 10, 2012

No one in this movie can act.

User review rating: 1 October 10, 2012

A major disappointment.

User review rating: 1 October 09, 2012

Anyway you look at it, this is a BAAAD movie.

User review rating: 0 October 09, 2012

Zero stars! I hated - HATED! - this pretentious and melodramatic time-waster! There's absolutely no story, and Emma Watson makes Kristen Stewart look like Meryl Streep! BOOOOOOOOO!

User review rating: 1 October 09, 2012

A steaming pile of poo.

User review rating: 5 October 09, 2012

absolutely amazing. moving and inspiring, easily relatable to teens and the struggles they go through in their adolescent youth, was very true to the amazing novel and could not have been better. the actors, script, directing, all was absolutely phenomenal :)

User review rating: 1 October 09, 2012

One giant pile of poo.

User review rating: 1 October 08, 2012

Bring lots of air freshener, this one stinks.

User review rating: 0 October 08, 2012

Zero stars! I've seen better acting at the Republican National Convention!

User review rating: 5 October 08, 2012

One of the most moving films I've seen in awhile; all authors should direct their own movies about their books because they get it spot on. Acting was superb, and the cast altogether was just phenomenal! :)

User review rating: 5 October 05, 2012

Loved this movie, i don't see how people hate it so much. they've either got something up their but or thier blind. go see it, allright movie

User review rating: 1 September 30, 2012

JAWS 3-D was more entertaining (and had much better acting).

User review rating: 1 September 30, 2012

Emits a foul odor, so stay away!

User review rating: 1 September 30, 2012

Superficial at best and just plain dumb at worst. Save yourself the trouble and watch HEATHERS to see this done the right way.

User review rating: 2 September 30, 2012

The lead "actress" can't act. Everything else was fine.

User review rating: 1 September 30, 2012

Fails because Watson isn't a good enough actress to carry a film. The poster who said Anna Kendrick would have made this something special was absolutely correct.

User review rating: 0 September 30, 2012

Incredible! anyone who thinks that Emma Watson can't act is Wrong and people that think Anna Kendrick would be better are just stupid,she wouldn't have a made a difference and for one she 27 the character Is 17/18. Anyway although it seems it's just fir Teenagers. it deals with some pretty deep stuff and older people will enjoy this movie too. Go see it.

User review rating: 5 September 28, 2012

Not what I expected, but a very well done movie about two very painful subjects--suicide and child abuse. Kudos to the cast for such a great portrayal.

User review rating: 0 September 28, 2012

Emma Watson can't act; Anna Kendrick would have made this a movie worth seeing.

User review rating: 5 September 28, 2012

Spectacular,, I recommend everyone go see it, the acting was really good and convincing. The soundtrack is amazing, chbosky captures this timeless story flawlessly with every sight and word. Not many can take a book with such depth and keep the heart and soul alive when translating it to the big screen but it happened here. Go to a theatre check it out. Besides it'sbetter than the other trash that's out right now. :)

User review rating: 5 September 27, 2012

Great! Everyone in the film was fantastic.

User review rating: 1 September 27, 2012

Watson is more painful to watch than Kristen Stewart. Are there no real actresses anymore???